Chicago RLTO     See The Entire RLTO

RLTO in Practice

RLTO Interest Rates

Illinois Deposit Cases

                      

     
 

ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT

Landis v MARC Realty LLC (2009)

VG Marina Mgmt. Corp. v. Wiener  (2007)

Lawrence v Regent Realty  (2001)

Dobbins v. Duquid  (1872)

 

ILLINOIS COURTS OF APPEAL

Berven v. Marquette Bank & Trust (2009)

Willis v. NAICO Real Estate (2008)

VG Marina Mgmt. Corp. v. Wiener  (2007, 2008)

Detrana v. Such  (2006)

Krawczyk v. Livaditis (2006)

Allen v. Lin  (2005)

Turner v. 1212 S. Mich. P'ship  (2005)

Starr v. Gay  (2004)

Sternic v. Hunter Properties (2003)

Pitts v. Holt (1999)

Namur v. The Habitat Company (1998)

American National Bank v. Powell  (1997)

Szpila v. Burke (1996)

Plambeck v.Greystone Management  (1996)

Friedman v. Krupp (1996)

Spiegel v. Hollywood Towers Cond. Assoc.  (1996)

Meyer v. Cohen (1993)

Solomon v. American Nat'l Bank and Trust Co.  (1993)

Reed v. Burns (1992)

 

 

 

 

Detrana v. Such, 368 Ill. App. 3d 861, 869-870 (1st Dist. 2006)

 

Neutral case for Tenants. Court of Appeals affirms that "owner occupied" means the owner lives in the building.  Tenant's argument that the owner who occupied the property isn't an owner because he didn't "control" the property doesn't fly.  Tenant's attorney is not sanctioned for advancing interpretation of RLTO § 020 where owner doesn't mean owner.

 

 

"Moreover, the fact that [the owner who occupied the building], pursuant to a power of attorney to defendants, allowed defendants to manage and receive income from the property does not conflict with the purpose of the RLTO, which allows for the owner-occupied exclusion from application of the RLTO. The fact that [the owner who occupied the building] did not claim the income from the property, and defendants did, has no relevance to the issue of whether [the owner who occupied the building] was an owner, since, like the term "control," which is not a term in the RLTO definition of "owner," there simply is no requirement in the definition that an owner exercise his right to receive all or part or any of the income from the property."

 

   
     

 

 
 


ATTENTION: Because the Illinois General Assembly and the various Illinois city councils may change, amend, or abolish the law without notice, the statutes provided here are not guaranteed to be an exact reproduction of the law at this time. The laws provided here are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon before taking any action. Please consult an attorney.
This web site is intended to supply general information to the public. Although the information is generally accurate, it cannot be guaranteed. The nature of Legislation is that laws change quickly, and visitors should always insure that legal information is accurate before relying on it. The above information applies the law of the State of Illinois and City of Chicago. The law in your jurisdiction may be different. This information is necessarily brief and may or may not apply to your situation. In all cases, PLEASE, consult a lawyer before acting.
This web site is not intended to be advertising, solicitation, or legal advice. Thus, the reader should not consider this information to be an invitation for an attorney-client relationship, should not rely on information provided herein, and should always seek the advice of competent counsel in the reader's state.